###
热喷涂技术:2022,14(4):35-41
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
喷砂工艺对 CB2 铁素体耐热钢表面粗糙度和 夹砂率的影响
(1.西南科技大学制造科学与工程学院;2.东方电气集团东方汽轮机有限公司长寿命高温材料国家重点实验室;3.重庆大学材料科学与工程学院)
Effect of Sandblasting Process on Surface Roughness and the Fractionof Grit Residue of CB2 Heat Resistant Stainless Steel
(1.School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Southwest University of science and Technology, Mianyan 621000;2. State Key Laboratory of Long-Life High Temperature Materials, Dongfang Electric Corporation Dongfang Turbing Co.,Ltd., Deyang 618000;3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 187次   下载 213
    
中文摘要: 为了研究喷枪位移方向和喷砂角度对喷砂质量(表面粗糙度、 夹砂率) 的影响规律, 使用自动喷砂设备 处理试样, 采用粗糙度仪、 激光显微镜、 扫描电镜 (SEM) 分别表征喷砂试样表面粗糙度、 微观形貌和夹砂率。 应用裂纹扩展理论和微切削理论系统地分析了表面粗糙度和夹砂率变化的机理。 在喷砂距离为 200 mm、 喷砂压 力为 0.3 MPa、 磨料流量为 3 kg/min、 喷枪位移速度为 0.8 m/s 的条件下, 喷砂角度为 15° 时表面粗糙度值和夹砂 率最小, 喷枪垂直走向表面粗糙度为 8 μm 夹砂率为 11.28%, 水平走向表面粗糙度为 5.7 μm 夹砂率为 15.68%; 喷砂角度为 75° 时表面粗糙度最大, 垂直走向粗糙度为 11.12 μm, 水平走向粗糙度为 10.13 μm; 喷砂角度为 90° 时夹砂率最大, 垂直走向夹砂率为 25.56%, 水平走向夹砂率为 25.33%。 结论表明, 表面粗糙度随喷砂角度增加 先增加后减小, 在 75° 时最大; 夹砂率随喷砂角度增加递增, 在 90° 时最大。 喷枪垂直走向下的表面粗糙度大于 水平走向下的表面粗糙度; 喷枪水平走向下的夹砂率大于垂直走向下的夹砂率。
Abstract:The work aims to study the effects of blast gun moving direction and sandblasting angle on surface roughness and the fraction of embedded grit. The samples were processed by automatic sandblasting equipment and then characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), laser microscope and surface toughness tester to quantify the surface roughness and the fraction of embedded grit retained in the steel matrix. Crack propagation theory and micro-cutting theory were used to analyze the processing factors including blast gun's moving direction and sandblasting angle in affecting surface roughness and the fraction of embedded grit. Under the conditions of standoff distance of 200 mm, sandblasting pressure of 0.3 MPa, blast media feed rate of 3 kg/min and displacement speed of blast gun of 0.8m/s, the surface roughness value and the fraction of embedded grit were the smallest when the sandblasting angle was 15°. At this time, the fraction embedded grit and surface roughness were determined to be 11.28% and 8 μm respectively for the vertical direction, 15.68 % and 5.7 μm for the horizontal direction. As the sandblasting angle increases, the surface roughness reaches the maximum at 75°, with value being 11.12 μm and 10.13 μm for the vertical and horizontal directions respectively. While the faction of embedded grit reaches the maximum at 90°, with the vertical one being 25.56% and horizontal one being 25.33%. To sum up, with increasing the sandblasting angle, the surface roughness increases first and reaches the maximum at 75°, then followed by a slight decrease, while the area fraction of embedded grit increases monotonously and eventually reaches the maximum at 90°. Compared to the horizontal direction, the vertical direction always exhibits a larger surface roughness but a lower fraction of embedded grits for a given blasting angle.
文章编号:     中图分类号:TG174.4    文献标志码:
基金项目:
Author NameAffiliation
Wang Yunpu School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Southwest University of science and Technology, Mianyan 621000 2. State Key Laboratory of Long-Life High Temperature Materials, Dongfang Electric Corporation Dongfang Turbing Co.,Ltd., Deyang 618000 3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University 
Yuan Xiaohu School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Southwest University of science and Technology, Mianyan 621000 2. State Key Laboratory of Long-Life High Temperature Materials, Dongfang Electric Corporation Dongfang Turbing Co.,Ltd., Deyang 618000 3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University 
Li Dingjun School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Southwest University of science and Technology, Mianyan 621000 2. State Key Laboratory of Long-Life High Temperature Materials, Dongfang Electric Corporation Dongfang Turbing Co.,Ltd., Deyang 618000 3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University 
Tang Chunmei School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Southwest University of science and Technology, Mianyan 621000 2. State Key Laboratory of Long-Life High Temperature Materials, Dongfang Electric Corporation Dongfang Turbing Co.,Ltd., Deyang 618000 3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University 
Yuan Weifeng School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Southwest University of science and Technology, Mianyan 621000 2. State Key Laboratory of Long-Life High Temperature Materials, Dongfang Electric Corporation Dongfang Turbing Co.,Ltd., Deyang 618000 3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University 
Lai Jianping School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Southwest University of science and Technology, Mianyan 621000 2. State Key Laboratory of Long-Life High Temperature Materials, Dongfang Electric Corporation Dongfang Turbing Co.,Ltd., Deyang 618000 3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University 
Yu Jiaxin School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Southwest University of science and Technology, Mianyan 621000 2. State Key Laboratory of Long-Life High Temperature Materials, Dongfang Electric Corporation Dongfang Turbing Co.,Ltd., Deyang 618000 3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University 
引用文本:
王云普,袁小虎,李定骏,唐春梅,袁卫锋,赖建平,余家欣.喷砂工艺对 CB2 铁素体耐热钢表面粗糙度和 夹砂率的影响[J].热喷涂技术,2022,14(4):35-41.

我们一直在努力打
造,精品期刊,传
播学术成果

全国咨询服务热线
010-63299752,9751,9758

杂志文章

杂志信息

联系我们

电话:010-63299752,9751,9758

Email:rptjs@bgrimm.com

邮编:100160

地址:北京市南四环西路188号总部基地十八区23号楼

关注微信公众号